Multivariate Continuous Bayesian Clinical Trials in R Pdf

  • Original Research
  • Published:

Bayesian Design for Pediatric Clinical Trials with Binary Endpoints When Borrowing Historical Information of Treatment Effect

  • 303 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The efficacy evaluation in pediatric population is an important component of drug development and is generally required by the regulatory agencies. It is often challenging to enroll pediatric subjects for a large trial especially when the incidence rate is low in certain disease areas. Bayesian framework can provide analytic avenues to effectively utilize historical information of the treatment effect and help make pediatric trials more efficient by reducing the sample size when there is evidence to suggest similarity of the treatment responses between the populations. Schoenfeld et al. (Clin Trials 6(4):297–304, 2009) proposed a Bayesian hierarchical model for efficacy extrapolation for continuous endpoints, which connects a single historical trial and the current trial by a variance parameter in the prior distribution. In this manuscript, we extend the existing model to borrow strength from multiple historical trials under the same assumptions and develop a quantitative method to borrow historical information more efficiently. Furthermore, we extend Schoenfeld's method based on continuous endpoints to binary endpoints with a hierarchical binomial model to extrapolate efficacy. Sensitivity analyses for the underlying assumptions are discussed with simulations and the methods are illustrated with a real case study, along with some practical considerations about how to choose the prior distribution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Indonesia)

Figure 1.

References

  1. Food US, Administration Drug. Exposure-response relationships—study design, data analysis, and regulatory applications. 2018.

  2. Mulugeta Y, Barrett JS, Nelson R, Eshete AT, Mushtaq A, Yao L, Glasgow N, Mulberg AE, Gonzalez D, Green D, Florian J. Exposure matching for extrapolation of efficacy in pediatric drug development. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(11):1326–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  3. Dixon DO, SimonSimon R. Bayesian subset analysis. Biometrics. 1991;47:871–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  4. Spiegelhalter JD, Abrams RK, Myles JP. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation, vol. 13. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004.

    Google Scholar

  5. Spiegelhalter David J, et al. Incorporating Bayesian ideas into health-care evaluation. Stat Sci. 2004;19(1):156–74.

    Article  Google Scholar

  6. GamaloSiebers M, Savic J, Basu C, Zhao X, Gopalakrishnan M, Gao A, Song G, Baygani S, Thompson L, Xia HA, Price K. Statistical modeling for bayesian extrapolation of adult clinical trial information in pediatric drug evaluation. Pharm Stat. 2017;16(4):232–49.

    Article  Google Scholar

  7. Kaur A, Skoner D, Ibrahim J, Li Q, Lockey RF, Blaiss M, Bufe A, Andersen JS, Canonica GW, Nolte H. Effect of grass sublingual tablet immunotherapy is similar in children and adults: a bayesian approach to design pediatric sublingual immunotherapy trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(5):1744–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  8. Schoenfeld DA, Zheng H, Finkelstein DM. Bayesian design using adult data to augment pediatric trials. Clin Trials. 2009;6(4):297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar

  9. Heinz S, Sandro G, Satrajit R, Anthony OH, David S, Beat N. Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information. Biometrics. 2014;70(4):1023–32.

    Article  Google Scholar

  10. Food US, Administration Drug. Guidance for the use of bayesian statistics in medical device clinical trials. Guidance for industry and FDA staff. US FDA Docket. 2010;(2006D-0191):50.

  11. Rubin DB. Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applies statistician. Ann Stat. 1984;12:1151–72.

    Article  Google Scholar

  12. Box George EP. Sampling and bayes' inference in scientific modelling and robustness. J R Stat Soc Series A (General). 1980;143(4):383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar

  13. Grieve AP. Idle thoughts of a well-calibrated Bayesian in clinical drug development. Pharm Stat. 2016;15(2):96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar

  14. Smania G, Baiardi P, Ceci A, Cella M, Magni P. Model-based assessment of alternative study designs in pediatric trials part ii: Bayesian approaches. CPT Pharmacometr Syst Pharmacol. 2016;5(8):402–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  15. Viele K, Berry S, Neuenschwander B, Amzal B, Chen F, Enas N, Hobbs B, Ibrahim JG, Kinnersley N, Lindborg S, Micallef S. Use of historical control data for assessing treatment effects in clinical trials. Pharm Stat. 2014;13(1):41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar

  16. Morris Tim P, White Ian R, Crowther MJ. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Stat Med. 2019;38(11):2074–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  17. Salman FT, DiCristina C, Chain A, Afzal AS. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric subjects. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(7):1384–90.

    Article  Google Scholar

  18. Diemunsch P, Gan TJ, Philip BK, Girao MJ, Eberhart L, Irwin MG, Pueyo J, Chelly JE, Carides AD, Reiss T, Evans JK. Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind phase iii trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(2):202–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  19. Food US, Administration Drug. Interacting with the fda on complex innovative trial designs for drugs and biological products. US Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Registrar. https://www.fda.gov/media/130897/download. 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man Jin PhD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Rights and permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, M., Li, Q. & Kaur, A. Bayesian Design for Pediatric Clinical Trials with Binary Endpoints When Borrowing Historical Information of Treatment Effect. Ther Innov Regul Sci 55, 360–369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00220-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00220-5

Keywords

  • Sample size calculations
  • Bayesian framework
  • Prior distributions
  • Hierarchical model
  • Pediatric clinical trials

pattersonequied.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43441-020-00220-5

0 Response to "Multivariate Continuous Bayesian Clinical Trials in R Pdf"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel